忍者ブログ

bottlee

There’s a significant need for quality videos to be created

×

[PR]上記の広告は3ヶ月以上新規記事投稿のないブログに表示されています。新しい記事を書く事で広告が消えます。

There’s a significant need for quality videos to be created

In cosmetic packaging Factory a 2017 study, researchers found that YouTube videos about brachytherapy, a radiation oncology procedure used to treat cancer, often had a strong commercial bias.They also evaluated each video using the DISCERN criteria, which rates consumer health information based on whether it’s clear, relevant, sourced, balanced, unbiased, describes risks and benefits, explains areas of uncertainty, and provides additional information sources. Miller, who wasn’t involved with this study, creates online videos for patients but also recommends talking to a doctor about the specifics of a procedure. Nose surgery videos had a DISCERN ranking of 2.21. They classified the videos as created by a health professional, patient or third party. Boris Paskhover of Rutgers New Jersey Medical School in Newark, in a phone interview.Blepharoplasty, or eyelid surgery, videos had the highest quality rating at 2. Arpan Prabhu of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center in Pennsylvania.".Viewers often get biased information, unbalanced evaluations of a procedure’s risks and benefits, and narrators with unclear qualifications, the study authors report in JAMA Facial and Plastic Surgery.4. Philip Miller of Gotham Plastic Surgery in New York City."When talking to my patients about (nose surgery), for instance, they’ll tell me what they know based on online videos, and oftentimes it’s not really what I do for a procedure," said senior author Dr. "Many videos only focus on how the nose will look, and they’re often superficial."There’s a significant need for quality videos to be created and uploaded," he told Reuters Health by email."Online health-related information is for the most part unregulated, and consumers should bear this in mind and think about the source of the material they are viewing or reading," said Dr.YouTube videos about facial plastic surgery procedures garner hundreds of millions of views - but they often present inaccurate medical information, a new study found. Trevor Kwok of the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia. "We hope to be part of the solution in the future. "But our understanding of exactly how this affects healthcare consumers is lagging."In the facial plastic surgery study, researchers saw a difference between the scores of videos with medical professionals versus those without.75, followed by the search term "facelift," with a score of 2.Among the videos, the research team found the term "nose job" received the most views with more than 56 million views for the top 10 videos and an average of 2."This is no longer an ‘emerging’ issue as the web and social media are already so ingrained in daily life," Kwok said by email. On a 1-5 scale, low scores indicate a low overall video quality."As is common with many procedures in medicine, sometimes it is easiest to see a video of how the procedure is carried out rather than reading a pamphlet or a consent form," said Dr."The information isn’t patient-specific and it doesn’t focus on the risks of a procedure," he said. "When it comes down to it, have a great relationship with your doctor and let your doctor guide your care."Patients should know the weaknesses of videos in other medical specialties, too."Paskhover and colleagues evaluated the top 240 videos related to plastic facial surgery on YouTube, including blepharoplasty (eyelid surgery), dermal fillers, facial fillers, otoplasty (ear surgery), rhytidectomy (a facelift), lip augmentation, lip fillers, and rhinoplasty (nose surgery).1 overall.Kwok, who wasn’t involved with this study, has evaluated YouTube videos about varicose vein treatments. For each video, the researchers determined the board certification status of narrators by using the American Board of Medical Specialties database.8 million views per video.Overall, however, most videos didn’t include information verified by medical professionals. Overall, the videos had an average score of 2. Prabhu, who wasn’t involved with this study, was the lead author on the brachytherapy study."By all means, educate yourself, but what’s on your monitor shouldn’t take on the power of authority," he told Reuters Health by phone."I tell my patients that 50 percent of what’s online - YouTube or otherwise - is wrong, and 49 percent is correct but completely irrelevant to your particular situation," said Dr
PR

コメント

プロフィール

HN:
No Name Ninja
性別:
非公開